Automated detection finds what it was told to look for. A hunt starts with a hypothesis about what it missed, and it needs data that can be asked anything, followed across sources and read back far enough. In the SANS 2025 Threat Hunting Survey, 58% of organizations hunt entirely in-house, and 61% name skilled staffing as their primary barrier.
Hunting
SANS describes threat hunting as an active practice for finding an adversary already inside the environment. Splunk’s PEAK framework defines it as any manual or machine-assisted search for what automated detection missed, and names three kinds of hunt. Each asks something different of the data.
Hypothesis
The hunter states what an attacker would have done and queries the logs for the trace. This needs a language that can express the question, and logs that reach back to when it happened.
Baseline
The hunter asks what changed. This needs each user and host measured against its own history, not against a rule.
Model-assisted
A model scores what departs from normal and the hunter reviews the highest. This needs the score shown with its evidence, and a model proven on this estate’s data before its findings count.
Questions
A hypothesis is only as useful as the question the tool can express. Failed VPN logins by user, PowerShell abuse in Sysmon or traffic to a blacklisted destination each have to survive translation into a query.
ARRTECH SIEM answers in a two-layer search language: a base search that selects sources, filters, groups and orders, then a pipeline of functions for statistics, lookups, geolocation and event combination. Classification turns vendor codes into plain categories, so one query for a successful login covers every vendor.
It searches raw logs in per-source indexes with retention you set, compressed at least 20:1, and an Archive Search page runs the same queries over archived logs. A hunt for the first sign of a compromise reads the logs written that day, signed and unchanged.
Relationships
Lateral movement is the hunt every method names first, and it does not sit in one log. The sign-in, the new session and the new process are each ordinary in their own source. The hunter needs the path, not the hops.
ARRTECH SIEM keeps a graph database of the threat neighborhood around each user and entity, and a graph query language walks it. Its forensic module reconstructs the sequence of events across network, system and application logs and maps allowed and blocked connections.
Cyberdroid AI Detection, part of the Cyberdroid SOC Platform, the AI layer of the ARRTECH Security Suite, maps relationships across identity, network, DNS, process and firewall telemetry, read from the SIEM export. A lateral-movement hunt follows the path instead of matching each hop.
Behavior
The SANS 2025 survey found living-off-the-land techniques in 76% of nation-state attacks. The tools are the administrator’s own, so there is no signature to match. The only signal is a user or host departing from its own history.
Cyberdroid AI Detection baselines every user, host and application against its own history and its peers. Every finding shows the observed value, the baseline, the score and the threshold, with an ordered evidence timeline.
Each of its 21 detectors runs in shadow until replay on your own telemetry proves it, and shadow findings arrive in a separate channel. To a hunter, that channel is the model-assisted hunt: a finding is a hypothesis with evidence attached.
Response
A hunt that ends in a document is run again next quarter by hand. The SANS 2025 survey found that only 51% of organizations formally measure hunting. The output has to become a detection, and what the detection finds has to reach a person who can act.
A query worth repeating is saved in ARRTECH SIEM as an alert or a correlation rule, so the next occurrence raises itself. A hunt that is not yet an incident opens a pre-incident case with its MITRE tactic and owner. The MITRE ATT&CK page shows which techniques your detections cover.
Isolating a host or disabling an account is a decision, and it belongs to people. Neither ARRTECH SIEM nor Cyberdroid AI Detection acts on the estate. A person approves, and ARRTECH SOAR runs the playbook from the alert action, with every decision recorded.
Limits
What the products do not do for a hunt.
Empty results
An empty result is a fact about your data before it is a fact about your estate. Cyberdroid AI Detection reports telemetry health beside every output, and the ARRTECH SIEM Data Sources page shows each source’s last read time and alerts when one goes silent, so you can tell nothing found from telemetry missing.
Timing
Cyberdroid AI Detection reads the SIEM export read-only, each hour after the hour closes. It is near-hourly and supplies starting points for a hunt, not a live feed.
Hunters
Neither product hunts on its own. The question, the pivot and the disposition are a person’s work. The products hold the data and show the evidence.
Evaluation
A proof of value runs beside your existing tools on labeled replay scenarios and at least one representative week of your own telemetry. Detection overlap and gaps, evidence completeness, precision and time to a defensible disposition are scored against a scorecard agreed before it begins.
Schedule a meetingSources
Products

Collects, signs and correlates every log, and answers hunts in a query language and a graph query language.

Cross-source behavioral detection on your SIEM: identity, network, DNS, process and firewall telemetry, baselined against each entity’s own history.